The Yinon Plan, “Greater Israel”, Syria, Iraq, and ISIS: the Connection
The Zionist Plan for the Middle East, also known as the Yinon Plan, is an Israeli strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority. It insists and stipulates that Israel must reconfigure its geo-political environment through the balkanization of the surrounding Arab states into smaller and weaker states.
When viewed in the current context, the war on Iraq, the 2006 war on Lebanon, the 2011 war on Libya, the ongoing war on Syria, not to mention the process of regime change in Egypt, must be understood in relation to the Zionist Plan for the Middle East. The latter consists in weakening and eventually fracturing neighboring Arab states as part of an Israeli expansionist project.
“Greater Israel” consists in an area extending from the Nile Valley to the Euphrates.
Israeli strategists viewed Iraq as their biggest strategic challenge. This is why Iraq was outlined as the centerpiece to the balkanization of the Middle East and the Arab World. In Iraq, on the basis of the concepts of the Yinon Plan, Israeli strategists have called for the division of Iraq into a Kurdish state and two Arab states, one Shiite and the other Sunni.
The Atlantic, in 2008, and the U.S. military’s Armed Forces Journal, in 2006, both published widely circulated maps that closely followed the outline of the Yinon Plan. Aside from a divided Iraq, the Yinon Plan calls for a divided Lebanon, Egypt, and Syria. The Yinon Plan also calls for dissolution in North Africa and forecasts it as starting from Egypt and then spilling over into Sudan, Libya, and the rest of the region.
“Greater Israel” requires the breaking up of the existing Arab states into small states. The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must
- become an imperial regional power, and
- must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states.
Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation… This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme.
Viewed in this context, the war on Syria is part of the process of Israeli territorial expansion. Israeli intelligence working hand in glove with the US, Turkey and NATO is directly supportive of the Al Qaeda terrorist mercenaries inside Syria.
The Zionist Project also requires the destabilization of Egypt, the creation of factional divisions within Egypt as instrumented by the “Arab Spring” leading to the formation of a sectarian based State dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood.
Similarly, although tweaked, the Yinon Plan is in motion and coming to life under the “Clean Break”. This is a policy document written in 1996 by Richard Perle and the Study Group on “A New Israeli Strategy Towards 2000″ for Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel at the time.
Like many in the neoconservative movement, Perle had long been an advocate of regime change in Iraq. In 1998 Perle led an effort known as the Project for the New American Century with close neoconservative allies Wolfowitz, Woolsey, Elliott Abrams, and John Bolton. The Project culminated in a letter sent to US President Bill Clinton calling for the military overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s regime.
Prior to and after the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Perle held several exclusive meetings in his home where he discussed issues regarding American foreign policy on Iraq. In an effort to help fund their goals, Ahmed Chalabi an Iraqi-born businessman and founder of the Iraqi National Congress, helped Perle secure millions of dollars from the U.S. government in 1990. Chalabi was one of the key figures driving the war in Iraq and helped transmit important “information” to U.S congress and the public that would successfully help sell the war effort.
One might remember that it was PNAC that also published the now infamous document “Rebuilding Americas Defenses” in which the following statement was made:
Further, the process of transformation [of the military], even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor”.
Finally, as mentioned above, the Armed Forces Journal published an article in 2006 entitled: “Blood Borders”.
What follows are maps based upon the description in the article. One is the Middle East as it currently exists, and the other is the Middle East according to the suggestions in the article:
You will note how congruent these divisions are with both the Yinon Plan and “Clean Break”.
You might also note that the advance of ISIS in Iraq, thus far, is congruent with all three documents. They are not engaging the Kurds and have stopped North of Baghdad, thus effectively dividing Iraq into three states as pictured on the map: Free Kurdistan, Sunni Iraq, and the Arab Shia State.
Only time will tell whether ISIS attempts to push into Baghdad, or whether the city, itself, is divided along sectarian lines. As you can see in the image, Baghdad is right on the border of “Sunni Iraq” and the “Arab Shia” State.
Here is a map of recent movements of the ISIS insurgency:
You will notice, by comparing them to the map above that they have control over the area depicted as “Sunni Iraq”. With the exception of Kirkuk, you will notice that the territory that they control aligns roughly with the borders of the proposed “Sunni Iraq” in the Blood Borders image above.
The following image is an overlay of the map of ISIS controlled territory over the map of the newly proposed borders of the Middle East to make it easier to see the congruity between ISIS movements and the Yinon plan:
While there are various conceptions of the borders of “Greater Israel” (Eretz Israel HaShlema), here is an overlay of the image of “Greater Israel” (above) on the map of the newly proposed borders of the Middle East to give a sense of the area of balkanized Arab states that Israel would have in its sphere of influence if the Yinon Plan is successfully implemented:
Either the Yinon Plan is actually being implemented, using the sectarian animosity within the Muslim community as the vector or it is phenomenally coincidental that from Sudan, to Egypt, Libya, Syria, and Iraq the essential tenets of the Yinon Plan are being implemented.
It would certainly explain many of incongruities that we see in US foreign policy, especially with regard to our decision to arm and fund radical Islamic groups in Syria.
Sources and further reading:
- Links to the full text of the Yinon plan: Link 1, Link 2.
- For other conceptions of “Greater Israel” see: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/israel/greater-israel-maps.htm
Original thread: http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/31323114/#q31323114
37 thoughts on “The Yinon Plan, “Greater Israel”, Syria, Iraq, and ISIS: the Connection”
Oy vey SHUT IT DOWN!!!
Don’t shoah me, goyim.
y is pol down
It’s not. Refresh the page or check your Internet connection.
This is great content I hope to see more exposing the Jew’s plans.
Breddy gud :DDDDD
Umm, this sort of Nazi rhetoric is not something that…. hold on a minute. My beard is caught in my son’s piggy bank…. Ok. As I was saying, I really am afraid of what this truthful reporting might do to Goy vs. Chosen People relations.
OY VEY, THE GOYIM KNOW
The goyim know, bury it!
Clean insight on the issue. I approve this site.
Thanks for the article, it has very interesting theories.
are you high? are you on drugs?
“journal from behind the scenes” and on drugs
The Yinon Plan, “Greater Israel”, Syria, Iraq, and ISIS: the Connection | The Times of Pol
Roger Vivier Shoes http://www.lepassagetoindia.com/rogervivier.asp
I am honored, Times of /pol/. Thank you for reposting the content of my thread. The more people that see it, the better.
… congratz2u bbut
0n November 7, 2014 at 4:49 pm
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Xtend’ded … as far as*s a i d
“If you want to know my strategy,
u k r a i n e
“____at a map” -bonaparte
This is brilliant, i love how your website is set up… also jidf will try to take your ass down fast and hard… best of luck!
I am not sure, but this could very well be the most ridiculous thing I have read on the internet.
The scariest thing to me is that there are literally thousands of people out there who eat this stuff up, believing that the TINY State of Israel (population of about 8 million total people – ALMOST 2 MILLION OF WHOM ARE ARAB), who could VERY EASILY during multiple defensive wars which they won expand is such a large area, who already passed up the opportunity to ‘fracture’ surrounding countries (literally fracture them, like with bombs) want now to expand from the Nile to the T/E…..
Clearly, the completely stoned person who came up with this idea not only hates the idea of Jews in general but has no clue about Israel itself. There is NO WAY Israel would be able to control an area that large, nor influence an area with that many different groups involved. They can not even control and influence everyone within their own boarders.
I think I am done, I am ready to leave this planet now…what the f*ck….
I believe it shame you don’t.
The ‘completely stoned person who came up with this idea’ was a former Israeli Foreign Ministry officer named Oded Yinon.
He wrote in February 1982: an article in an Israeli Journal saying that Israel should exploit internal tensions within Arab States.
The winter issue of Kivunim, a “A Journal for Judaism and Zionism,” published “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties” by Oded Yinon. The paper, published in Hebrew, rejected the idea that Israel should carry through with the Camp David accords and seek peace. Instead, Yinon suggested that the Arab States should be destroyed from within by exploiting their internal religious and ethnic tensions: “Lebanon’s total dissolution into five provinces serves as a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and the Arabian peninsula and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon.” [Kivunim, 2/1982]
While Israel may lack the person-power to implement the plan in full, their surrogate mother – the US – does not.
Note: it is not necessary to occupy all the land involved, simply to control it one way or another.
Clearly, the intention towards ‘destabilization of Egypt, the creation of factional divisions within Egypt as instrumented by the “Arab Spring” leading to the formation of a sectarian based State dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood.’ (outlined above) has not been achieved, though Egypt is being fully compliant today with Israel and the US, in line with the Yinon Plan.
Nothing but a pipe dream back in time. Today on the ground Israel stand isolated & weak. The multi_passporters will scatter at the slightest disturbance.
the most ridiculous thing I have read on the internet. The scariest thing to me is that there are literally thousands of people out there who eat this stuff up, believing that the TINY State of Israel who could VERY EASILY during multiple defensive wars which they won expand is such a large area, who already passed up the opportunity to ‘fracture’ surrounding countries (literally fracture them, like with bombs) want now to expand from the Nile
Oy vei Hershel don’t read that script, we already used it in this page.
The comments including the alleged Israeli/US plan to use ISIS against Muslim States is frightening. This could in time to lead to fragmentation and wars throughout West Asia and its neighbourhood, if it is even half true.